Page 1 of 1
"LoopOut" expression ovverrides Duik "Spring"
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:28 pm
by ricciofix
I love the "Spring" Duik effect, but when I try to loop ( loopOut(type = "cycle", numKeyframes = 0) ) an animation with "Spring" I get the loop but the "Spring" effect looks disabled.
Is it normal? I tried to write the loop expression before and after the "Spring" script.
Any Idea? I have really basic scripting skills
Re: "LoopOut" expression ovverrides Duik "Spring"
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 1:24 pm
by Duduf
Modifying the expression with a spring to loop it may be (very) difficult; I think a nice and quick way to do this would be to precompose and use some time remapping

Re: "LoopOut" expression ovverrides Duik "Spring"
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 3:09 pm
by ricciofix
Duduf wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 1:24 pm
Modifying the expression with a spring to loop it may be (very) difficult; I think a nice and quick way to do this would be to precompose and use some time remapping
That's what i did in some cases, but i like to make loops indiepent from each other so that they create new variations randomly, i can probably make different comps, but I'd prefer not ti do that
Re: "LoopOut" expression ovverrides Duik "Spring"
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 12:03 am
by ricciofix
Duduf wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 1:24 pm
Modifying the expression with a spring to loop it may be (very) difficult; I think a nice and quick way to do this would be to precompose and use some time remapping
I didn't notice it was Duduf to answer !!!

Thank you!
Re: "LoopOut" expression ovverrides Duik "Spring"
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:05 am
by Duduf
ricciofix wrote: ↑Fri Apr 20, 2018 3:09 pm
That's what i did in some cases, but i like to make loops indiepent from each other so that they create new variations randomly, i can probably make different comps, but I'd prefer not ti do that
I understand... That's an interesting problem, but I really don't see a good way to loop a property with a spring. Another solution would be to bake expressions into keyframes, then removing the unneeded ones to add a loopOut expression, but it may be a bit too destructive, depending on the complexity of the animation of the property...
And... Yes, it's me
